MeanaTechnologies
Practical AI implementation for firms, built around the confidentiality and competence obligations you already carry.
Many firms are having the same two conversations. The first is about opportunity: associates and paralegals are already using these tools, with or without permission, and some of that work is genuinely faster. The second is about exposure: nobody at the firm knows what happens to a client's information after it is pasted into a chat window, and nobody wants to be the cautionary tale at the next CLE.
Both conversations stall in the same place. The firm has no policy, so it cannot approve anything. It has no evaluation, so it cannot choose between the six vendors that have called this month. And there is no partner with a spare forty hours to figure it out.
The firms that handle this well are not the ones that adopt the most AI. They are the ones that decided, in writing, where it is appropriate and where it is not, and then trained everyone to the same standard.
That is the work we do. We are full-time AI engineers, and we spend our time moving firms from ad hoc, unsupervised use to something deliberate. By the end of it a firm has a written policy and a tool stack that somebody has actually evaluated. Its staff know how to use what they have been given. Two or three workflows also run measurably faster than they did before.
A four-week engagement that takes a firm from no formal position on AI to a documented, trained, operating one. It is the right starting point for most firms, and it is designed so that when it ends, the firm is self-sufficient rather than dependent on us.
For firms that have already chosen their tools and simply need everyone brought to the same level. You get a half-day onsite session and the recording of it, plus a prompt library built around your practice areas and a quick reference guide. There is no assessment, no policy work and no configuration. This one is training only.
Ongoing support after an engagement ends. There are monthly office hours, and we answer questions in between them. Every quarter we refresh your prompt library as the tools change. New hires get onboarding materials. We only offer this to firms we have already worked with, and we keep the number of them small so that the response times mean something.
Four weeks, structured so that almost none of it requires your attorneys to be away from billable work.
Is any of this going to put client information somewhere it should not be?
That is the right first question, and it is where the engagement starts rather than where it ends. Part of the assessment is a plain language account of how each tool handles what you put into it. Does the vendor train on your inputs? How long is anything kept? Where does it live? Will they sign a data protection agreement? Some tools come through that fine. Several do not, and the policy names them.
We bill hourly. Why would we want our work to take less time?
Realistically, the hours that disappear are the ones you were already writing off or absorbing. Reformatting. Summarizing. Chasing down a document somebody else has. Getting a first draft of a letter onto the page. What you get back is capacity. Attorneys can carry more matters. Flat fee work stops losing money. Associates spend their day on work you can actually bill.
How much of our people's time does this take?
Roughly six hours per person across four weeks, and most of that is the training session. Interviews run thirty minutes and are scheduled around your calendar.
What happens when the tools change in six months?
They will. That is why everything we leave behind is built for your firm to maintain. The policy is written to survive a tool swap. The workflows are documented as procedures instead of living in one person's head. The training is recorded, so somebody hired in March gets the same version everyone else got. The retainer exists for firms that would rather not keep up with it themselves.
We are full-time AI engineers. Building these systems is what we do professionally, so we know where they fail and where the vendors are overstating things. We can also tell you which of the twelve products being marketed to your firm are actually different from one another.
We work with a small number of firms at a time, one engagement at a time. That is a deliberate constraint. It means scheduling requires some lead time, and it also means that when your engagement is underway, it has our full attention.
A short call to talk through how your firm is currently handling this, and whether an engagement makes sense. No preparation needed on your side.
Or write to contact@meanatech.com.